Shared Decision Making
District Plan for Implementing Shared Decision Making
In accordance with the Commissioner’s Regulation 100.11, school districts throughout New York State must have a Shared Decision-Making Plan on file with the State Education Department. In addition to the Shared Decision-Making Plan, Commissioner’s Regulation 100.11 requires school districts to submit a Biennial Review of the Plan. A District-wide Shared Decision-Making Committee should review the plan and submit it to the Board of Education (BOE) for approval. After approval by the local Board, the district will submit the plan to the local Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) and then to the State Education Department.
As the largest and sole small city school district in Ulster County, the Kingston City School District (KCSD) spans 98 square miles and serves approximately 6,000 students in Grades Pre-K through 12 who attend classes in 11 school buildings. The student body comprises both children of families who recently moved to the district for all it has to offer, and children of lifelong residents, many with multiple generations having attended KCSD.
KCSD embraces the rich diversity of the families we serve, as evidenced by our district mission, “We Inspire. We Educate. We Graduate. All students. All of the time.” At every grade level, instruction is tailored to students’ abilities. Innovation is an innate part of the organizational culture, where KCSD continuously seeks new and better ways for students to achieve success. Robust extra-curricular programs, sports, art, technology, community service, and culture extend the student experience and support their success in the classroom.
KCSD’s faculty and staff, consisting of a diverse group of over 1,100 individuals, enjoy a positive collegial environment characterized by strong camaraderie and mutual respect. KCSD has also cultivated and greatly appreciates the powerful relationships it has created with a wide array of community partners, working together closely to align programs based on student needs.
District and/or Building Committees/Work Groups:
Kingston City School District has various committees and/or work groups that meet throughout the year both on the District and building level. Depending on the committee, the committee members may consist of:
- Students (*Title IV Part A Middle/High School)
- Principals and /or Administrators (*Title I, II, III, IV Part A)
- Board Members
- Community Partners and Organizations with Demonstrated Expertise (* Title II, III Part A)
- Parents (*Title I, II, III, IV Part A)
- Teachers (*Title I, II, III, IV Part A)
- Paraprofessionals (* Title I, II Part A)
- Support Staff/Other District Staff
- Specialized Instructional Support Personnel and Other School Personnel (* Title I,II Part A)
- Other School Leaders
- Public or Private Entities and Institutes of Higher Education (if appropriate Title III Part A)
- Researchers (Title III Part A)
- Community Based organizations (Title IV Part A)
- Local Government representatives and Tribal Organizations (if appropriate Title IV Part A)
- When committees and/or work groups are formed, they should take into account the formulation of goals and objectives, organizational and personnel needs, and availability of resources.
Every effort should be made such that members of committees representing “parents” should not be District employees.
All members are expected to communicate with and seek input and feedback from their constituency groups.
It is understood that after the Shared decision-making process is used to gather appropriate input in connection with a topic or situation, final authority on all matters rests with the Superintendent and the Board of Education.
The plan for participation in school-based planning and shared decision making shall specify:
Component #1: The educational issues which will be subject to cooperative planning and shared decision making at the building level by teachers, parents, and administrators, and, at the discretion of the board of education or BOCES, other parties such as students, school district support staff, and community members.
Component #2: The manner and extent of the expected involvement of all parties.
Component #3: The means and standards by which all parties shall evaluate improvement in student achievement.
Component #4: The means by which all parties will be held accountable for the decision which they share in making.
Component #5: The process whereby disputes presented by the participating parties about the educational issues being decided upon will be resolved at the local level.
Component #6: The manner in which all State and Federal requirements for the involvement of parents in planning and decision making will be coordinated with and met by the overall plan.
- Component # 1: Educational Issues Subject to Shared Decision Making
- Component #2: Involvement of All Parties
- Component #3: Means and Standards to Growth Evaluate Improvement in Student
- Component #4: Means and standards by which all parties will be held accountable for the decisions they are making
- Component #5: Dispute Resolution Process
- Component #6: Coordination of State and Federal Requirements for Parental Involvement
Component # 1: Educational Issues Subject to Shared Decision Making
Component #2: Involvement of All Parties
Component #3: Means and Standards to Growth Evaluate Improvement in Student
Component #4: Means and standards by which all parties will be held accountable for the decisions they are making
Component #5: Dispute Resolution Process
Component #6: Coordination of State and Federal Requirements for Parental Involvement
Limitations of Committees:
Matters related to the curriculum are within the non-delegable discretion of the board of education. Matter of Zaleski, 36 Ed. Dept. Rep. 284 (1997).
The formulation of the school district’s budget is non-delegable to shared decision making. Matter of Kasperg, 35 Ed. Dept. Rep. 208 (1995).
Under §1709(2) of the Education Law and Commissioner Regulation 100.2(l) the board of education has the non-delegable duty to establish a discipline code. These functions are not delegable to a shared decision-making committee. Moravia Teachers Association, 36 Ed. Dept. Rep. 413 (1997).
Decisions and actions of District and building committees cannot supersede provisions of an existing collective bargaining agreement or bypass the grievance process available under an existing agreement.
Decisions and actions of District and building committees cannot violate federal, state, or district laws, mandates, and/or policies.
Decisions of District and building committees cannot commit the District or another department, unit, or school to some action without their prior knowledge and involvement.
Authority. NYSED Regulation 100.11 does not grant specific authority to school-based planning teams to enforce but rather creates a framework for how discussion should take place. Subsequent NYSED Commissioner’s decisions (e.g. Appeal of Zaleski & Appeal of Tulip) have clarified that school based-based planning teams cannot replace the statutory authority of the Board of Education and such serve as a body to advise but not compel administrative action.
Committee Members | |
---|---|
Shelley Burch |
Parent |
Danielle Doyle |
Parent |
Diana Lopez Martinez |
Parent |
Katy Dwyer |
Parent |
Britta Riley |
Parent |
Stephanie Kerns |
Parent |
Malia Cordel |
Parent |
Katrin Bjork |
Parent |
Emily Daniels |
Parent |
Ashley Stratton-Ryner |
Parent |
Ashley Knox |
Community Partner |
Calief Housen |
Community Partner |
Sophie Rhind |
Community Partner |
Debra Fitzgerald |
ASPA |
Bonnie VanKleeck |
KTF |
Erica Longendyke |
CSEA |
Andrew Sheber |
ASPA |
Stacie Kremper |
ESP |
Jared Van Aken |
Non-aligned |
Kayla Jacobs |
Student |
Jackson Cutrone |
Student |
Kathy Sellitti |
Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion |
Dr. Stacia Felicello |
Administration |
Dr. Lynnette Williams |
Administration |
Kirk Reinhardt |
Administration |
Jodi Clemente |
ESP |
Jared Carrano |
Parent |
Jackson Cutrone |
Student |